社会脆弱性与社区韧性是灾害风险管理的关键分析框架。环境感知质量亦通过塑造社会资本及灾后心理恢复能力，影响灾害后果。然而，现有研究极少考察感知质量如何与韧性–脆弱性系统相关联，致使实践者难以判断感知质量是否以及如何与韧性相关配置及社会脆弱性发生交互作用。此外，分析此类关联需首先厘清感知质量的概念内涵，因其在主观体验与客观环境之间缺乏明确的本体论定位，从而阻碍其与韧性–脆弱性系统形成连贯的理论联结。因此，本文将街景感知质量重新界定为‘街道景观氛围’（streetscape atmosphere），即一种前主体性的、跨尺度的感知背景，介于主体与客体之间，兼具物质性与社会性，并可通过聚合众包评判数据予以量化。本研究以美国东北部为案例，采用受控空间滞后模型并结合分解分析法。研究发现呈现三种模式：第一，高社会脆弱性系统性地与较低美感、更高压抑感的街道景观氛围相关联，该模式揭示了街道景观氛围中累积性劣势对结构性不平等的强化效应；第二，住房与基础设施韧性与较低美感、更高压抑感的氛围相关，而制度韧性则与更低压抑感的氛围相关；第三，这些氛围特征通过公共空间环境的可见构成及其维护状况得以物质化表达。本研究是首批将街道景观氛围纳入韧性–脆弱性系统实证分析的探索之一。

Social vulnerability and community resilience are essential frameworks for disaster risk management. Environmental perception quality also affects disaster outcomes by shaping social capital and postdisaster psychological recovery. As existing research seldom examines how perception quality is associated with the resilience–vulnerability system, however, practitioners cannot determine whether and how perception quality might interact with resilience-related configurations and social vulnerability. Furthermore, analyzing these associations requires clarification of perception quality, as this concept lacks a distinct ontological position between subjective experience and objective environment, hindering its coherent theoretical linkage with resilience–vulnerability systems. Therefore, we redefine street-view perception quality as streetscape atmosphere, a presubjective cross-scale perceptual background that exists between subject and object, possesses materiality and sociality, and can be quantified using aggregated crowdsourced judgments. Our case study of the Northeastern United States uses a controlled spatial lag model with decomposition analysis. The findings reveal three patterns. First, high social vulnerability is systematically associated with less beautiful and more depressing atmospheres. This pattern signals accumulated disadvantages in streetscape atmosphere that compound structural inequalities. Second, housing and infrastructure resilience aligns with less beautiful and more depressing atmosphere, whereas institutional resilience aligns with less depressing atmosphere. Third, these atmosphere signatures are materially expressed through both the visible composition and the maintained condition of public-space environments. This study is one of the first to clarify the ontology of street-view perception quality and to pioneer the integration of streetscape atmosphere into resilience–vulnerability frameworks. It provides an empirical basis for disaster risk management and policy design.